In Doha, a “Climate of Fear”

By Charles Rollet



Press releases, snazzy conferences, and promotional videos all tell one story about Northwestern in Qatar: that of a successful branch campus which, despite some initial hurdles, is flourishing.

As Provost Dan Linzer said at an event in Norris last October, NU-Q has “transitioned from a start-up to a thriving school, wrestling with the same kinds of issues schools here wrestle with.”

But behind the finely-tailored PR lies a harsh reality for its employees, according to many current and former staffers.

They say a recent period of restructuring has reinforced a “climate of fear” which leaves many fearful for their job security, with many afraid to speak out because they are scared their job contracts will not be renewed.

Allegations of discrimination have rocked NU-Q’s workplace as well. Many say one employee was let go for being LGBTQ, and at least one more has filed a formal discrimination complaint.

And while NU-Q’s restructuring has created a new drive to produce research, this may rest on shakier ground than appears at first glance, with politically sensitive survey questions directly censored by the Qatari government.

In an exclusive report based on interviews with over fifteen current and former employees, THE CHRONICLE has detailed this climate of fear. (Almost all workers interviewed spoke on condition of strict anonymity.)

It’s a long story of power struggles, faculty politics, culture shock, and vast sums of money. And it’s been happening right under Northwestern’s nose, unreported until now.


A Rocky Start

 Before NU-Q’s current problems with its employees can be explored, it must be understood just how quickly an entirely new Northwestern campus was set up from scratch.

In late 2007, Northwestern in Evanston agreed to have a Qatar branch, and by the next fall, a fully-functioning, degree-granting American campus was brought to existence.

Of course, fully-functioning is one way of putting it. Creating such a totally new institution led to a host of what Northwestern calls “startup problems,” many of which continue to this day.

Pests plagued student dorms. The registration system bugged because it operated under a US time zone. The school even had to re-order new diplomas for its first graduating class which made no mention of Qatar (students wanted diplomas identical to those issued in Evanston.)dusty

One former staffer said the numerous problems meant many student affairs workers worked “incessantly” for 70 hour weeks.

Another mentioned getting 5AM emails from colleagues who woke up hours before work to finish paperwork, saying “I do know the burnout is a bigger contributor to the staff turnover than anywhere else.”

On top of the intense workload, employees had the added stress of operating in a completely different culture than the US with little to no training about the region.

At times, these cultural differences clashed and directly affected certain peoples’ jobs.

Former NU-Q workers cited the case of one female employee who, at an academic fair, mentioned street harassment by Qatari men as one of the “minuses” of living in Doha (she had been the subject of such harassment herself.) But she was overheard by a Qatari who took offense over what he saw as a gross generalization about locals; after he wrote a letter, she was fired.

Quote_1_finalSuch incidents of cultural misunderstandings made non-faculty employees nervous about their jobs, which could be over “the moment you piss off a Qatari with a little wasta,” (the local term for “connections,”) said one former staffer.

This environment of intense work and culture shock took a psychological toll for many. “I had people in my office crying all the time. Bawling on a regular basis,” the same former staffer said.

The workplace at NU-Q, however, was made better by some factors.

For one, employees are paid significantly more in the Middle East than in the US – it’s not for nothing they’re nicknamed “mercenaries” in the country. But it wasn’t all about the money.

Many said they genuinely enjoyed living in Qatar and experiencing its unique culture. “I think overall it was a great place to work,” said one employee who left in 2011. “Now, I think that the student and academic experience in NU-Q is incredibly enriching. The downside to that is aside from complete material freedom, there is a little bit of intellectual constraints that happen.”

It also helped that NU-Q’s first Dean, John Margolis, was generally regarded as a kindly and transparent person who was personally close to many students and faculty.

But despite Margolis’ geniality, many start-up problems remained at NU-Q, and the school retained a low profile. It was far from a research powerhouse Northwestern in Evanston could boast about, and its schools, which taught communications and journalism, lacked unity. (Margolis “let the schools really run themselves,” staffers say, and he “didn’t really care about research,” focusing more on teaching.)

When Margolis retired in 2011, it was time for NU-Q to get a new Dean, and the choice made was of a more corporate flavour: Everette E. Dennis, who remains NU-Q’s “Dean and CEO” to this day. Little did NU-Q’s employees know, but Dennis’ rule heralded the beginning of a new period of restructuring at NU-Q which has bitterly divided the workplace ever since.


 Clearing the House

 Dennis was, unlike Margolis, a prominent name in journalism and communications education – and a zealous reformer.

Dennis came to prominence in the 80s advocating that journalism schools increase research activity and combine their curricula into one “generic mass communications study” taught by experts with PhDs rather than journalists.

Staffers say Evanston’s vision for NU-Q was to unite its disparate schools and vigorously expand research, and Dennis, described as an “indefatigable organizer” who “gets things done,” was a perfect match for the job.

But many of these ambitious goals required a total overhaul of NU-Q’s staff, which set Dennis on a collision course with much of the existing NU-Q community Margolis had built up.

When he arrived to take over NU-Q in June 2011, staffers say Dennis made it clear he was going to “clear the house” and begin restructuring NU-Q. That involved letting go several employees (that is, not renewing their contracts) abruptly and with little due process, those affected said.

On the non-faculty side, some of the first to go remain shaken to this day.

Charlene Thomas, NU-Q’s only registrar until 2012, was told by a colleague’s wife one day: “I hear you’re leaving.” Thomas had no idea her contract was not going to be renewed; as the school’s lone registrar, she thought her job was safe. But after working for nine years at Northwestern in the US and three in Doha, she was suddenly told she was no longer needed at NU-Q.

Thomas, who was a Northwestern “Employee of the Year” in 2005, was in a state. “I was shocked,” she told THE CHRONICLE. The bitter irony: right before she was told she would not be renewed, Thomas had several job leads in the Gulf which she could have pursued but decided not to because she wanted to stay at NU-Q.

After Thomas left, NU-Q didn’t have a registrar for over a year; her work was simply outsourced to the already-overworked administrative staff. (Thomas is back in the US and still out of work.)


The lack of a full-time registrar led to scheduling problems for some instructors. One faculty member told THE CHRONICLE that “a couple times I showed up [in class] at the very beginning of the semester and my students weren’t there.”

Thomas was not the only non-faculty staff member affected. Another was also abruptly not renewed around the time Dennis began his restructuring.

“In my case I was just told, your contract is not going to be renewed but you need to leave now,” the former employee told THE CHRONICLE.

The staffer had worked at Northwestern in Evanston for almost 25 years and had to return to the US without a job, eventually finding a new one through a temp agency.

Even though it was understood there would be no job waiting back in Evanston, the former staffer said little respect was paid to job termination processes prescribed by HR at Northwestern in Evanston.

“On the main campus, if they want to get rid of you, you have to have so many warnings, you know there’s a process to go through,” the staffer said.

Others agreed that this uncertainty contributed to a “climate of fear” at the school.

“You might not know that your contract is being renewed until you got six weeks left on your current contract, and your legal ability to be in the country is tied to your employment,” said another former staffer. “And those are the kinds of scare tactics, those are the kinds of things that contribute to the climate of fear, the very, very real climate of fear that exists at NU-Q.”

This environment, in which one’s contract can be “not renewed” seemingly on a whim makes some quite terrified of airing any criticisms whatsoever – even under anonymity.

“I have learned in my years at NU-Q who to trust, and they are few,” said one faculty member who declined to be interviewed at greater length.

Quote 2.5_final

Dennis’ plans affected people on the teaching side as well.

Faculty members who had contracts coming up for renewal in 2012 were told they would be put “under review” by external assessors, which made the workplace nerve-wracking. For months, many were convinced their jobs would be over.

“Everybody was totally freaked out by this,” one faculty member told THE CHRONICLE.

Despite the reviews, most of the faculty’s contracts were renewed. Some accuse Dennis of supposedly trying to “fire everybody at once” but switching to “firing selectively” (several faculty have left this past year.) Whether this is true or not, it’s certain the ambitious restructuring turned several faculty members against him. (The popular term NU-Q’s old timers use to refer to Dennis’ new hires from his networks is “cronies.”)

Additionally, at least one faculty member has filed a discrimination complaint against NU-Q with the Office of Equal Opportunity and Access in Evanston.


THE CHRONICLE tried to ask Dennis at an information session in Evanston on February 5th about NU-Q’s workplace issues and a “climate of fear” at NU-Q.

“You seem to have an agenda,” Dennis said, accusing THE CHRONICLE of “hound[ing] people for months.”

“What the hell are you doing?” Dennis said.

After he was asked if he would follow up via email, Dennis replied, “No, I’m not going to follow up. That’s enough with you, sir.”


“Not much we could do about it.”

Aside from Dennis’ clash with some faculty over the reviews, the case of one of the first people on the teaching side to not have their contract renewed sparked considerable controversy at the school.

Numerous current and former colleagues independently told the THE CHRONICLE the instructor’s LGBTQ status was the reason behind Dennis’s decision not to renew the contract.

When reached for comment, the instructor (who did not take legal action) said this was true but declined to discuss specifics.

“This history is difficult for me to reconstruct because it was so challenging to get through and because the things I was told didn’t make any sense to me,” the instructor, who now works in the US, wrote in an email.

The instructor heard the Qatari government itself was the source of the decision (due to homosexuality’s illegality in the country) but “did not necessarily believe” the authorities were involved.

The instructor was popular with many NU-Q students who cherished having an openly LGBTQ teacher in a conservative country, and was described as “good for students and beloved by students – maybe more so than anybody else,” by one former faculty member.

The state of gay rights at NU-Q is something of a taboo topic with its administration. While Northwestern in Evanston has a fully-staffed LGBTQ resource center, a Rainbow Alliance, and several other groups for sexual minorities, this is not the case in Qatar. When asked about gay rights at NU-Q, staffers say the policy is basically “don’t-ask-don’t-tell.”

An internal PowerPoint obtained by THE CHRONICLE prepared for NU-Q by the law firm Patton Boggs titled Living and Working in Qatar makes it clear homosexuality is illegal and receives up to 7 years in prison. There is no indication whatsoever NU-Q employees or students are exempt from such laws.




“It is in the faculty contracts that we have to abide by the customs and laws of the country,” said the previously-quoted former faculty member.

This glaring disparity in law – which predates Dennis’ arrival, to be sure – has led to some rather unusual conversations at NU-Q. At the meeting in which the Living and Working in Qatar PowerPoint was shown (on August 21st, 2013,) faculty members were concerned about one clause which stated that failing to inform the authorities of a felony was punishable by jail and a fine.

According to one person present at the meeting, some were worried that if they didn’t report a gay student to the authorities they would be prosecuted under such a law. The attorney present at the meeting “didn’t really have an answer for that.”




THE CHRONICLE asked senior associate dean Richard Roth about the status of gay faculty at NU-Q. Roth said that while the university is supportive, “if they were to be arrested, I don’t know what we would do. They would be in violation of the law here.”Quote_2_final

“Not much we could do about it.”

Other parts of the PowerPoint presentation also make it clear freedom of speech for NU-Q is not the same as Northwestern in Evanston.

“Anyone who criticizes and/or challenges, by any public means, the Emir’s authority or rights” receives “up to 5 years imprisonment,” the slide titled Respect for God & Government reads.

[To see the PowerPoint in its entirety, click here.]


 Faculty Politics

 In light of NU-Q’s change-of-course, it’s not surprising Dennis is said to have clashed with higher-up administrators.

One of them, faculty members told THE CHRONICLE, was Richard Roth, who went from being the director of NU-Q’s journalism programme to a “senior associate dean” who mostly works behind the scenes placing NU-Q students for their residencies.

Staffers say the change in position happened at least partly because Roth, a veteran reporter described by many as questioning of authority, didn’t like Dennis’ plans to “bulldoze” NU-Q’s old faculty.

In an interview with THE CHRONICLE, Roth denied such reports, saying, “I don’t think there was a clash at all. When a new Dean shows up he or she comes in with A) a vision and B) perhaps mandates from the provost and [the Dean] implements those.”

Regardless of these reports, Roth does appear to differ with Dennis on some key points. For one, Roth has a different view of NU-Q’s impact on Qatar’s media scene, which is heavily censored. While Dennis said at the February information session in Evanston that the press environment in Qatar has gotten significantly better since NU-Q arrived, Roth remains doubtful.

“I like to think [NU-Q has] helped, but I don’t really see great evidence of it,” Roth told THE CHRONICLE.

This skeptical side of Roth came through in a recent interview in which he condemned an Orwellian piece of draft legislation in Qatar, the Cybercrime Law, which would punish online reporting which infringes on “social principles” and “values” – even if the information reported is true.

“I don’t know what I’ve said on my blog that would get me in trouble,” Roth said in the interview.

Roth and Dennis also seem to contradict each other when it comes to a controversial Faculty Senate motion from last year.

When Northwestern in Evanston’s Faculty Senate decided to pass a motion supporting the Qatari poet Mohammed al-Ajami (who was imprisoned for 15 years for criticising the Emir of Qatar in a poem), NU-Q’s senate members studiously ignored the motion, refusing to support it.

Dennis said at the February information session that members of the NU-Q community were unified against the motion, explaining that NU-Q is not “responsible for anything going on with the government.”

But Roth, a senior member of NU-Q’s administration who has been at NU-Q since its beginning in 2008, said he was never asked about the motion.

“Nobody asked my opinion, because I would have voiced one,” Roth said. “I for one was supportive of it, I was not against it.”

Roth and Dennis do agree that the school’s main goal is to create, as Dennis recently put it, a “talent pool” of journalists in Qatar who will eventually hold positions of influence in the country’s media and  – it is implied – reform it.

But substantial obstacles to this remain, considering most of NU-Q’s journalism students go into the far more lucrative and less dangerous field of public relations. Not a single NU-Q student has joined the country’s local newspapers, although it must be kept in mind that only two classes have graduated.

Other factors, such as Qatar’s citizen-based hierarchy, also come into play; when Roth described the poor state of reporting in Qatar’s local papers, he bluntly said “the non-Qataris can rise in the ranks but they will never be editor.”

Roth is leaving after spring quarter, and with him gone, there will not be a single faculty member left who has called for reform of Qatar’s government in the press. (Roth wrote a New York Times op-ed last May urging Qatar to modernise its outdated press law; three weeks later, the substantially more restrictive Cybercrime Law was unveiled, and looks likely to pass as of February 2014.)

The other director who left, James Schwoch, also became an ambiguous “senior associate dean” after heading NU-Q’s communication programme.

Schwoch, even though he’s described as more of a “company man” than Roth, didn’t have a very good relationship with Dennis either, sources say.

According to one faculty member, before he left Doha to come back to Evanston, Schwoch declined an invitation to a going-away party because if he drank and his tongue was loosened “all of the vitriol” would spill out.

“I think he was incredibly upset at the direction the school was going,” said the faculty member.



 It’s undeniable, however, that Dennis has greatly bolstered the role NU-Q plays both at home and abroad. Under his tenure, NU-Q has massively expanded into research, conferences, and further academics.

Just to get an idea of how ambitious this programme is for a relatively small school with only 33 graduates in its latest class, in the past two years NU-Q has: published a massive research study about media use in the Middle East, offered a certificate in Middle East studies and another in Media and Politics, and has most recently proposed to offer masters degrees “within two years.”

The Arab Media Use Study’s publication was particularly significant. It was meant to objectively report how people in the Arab world use and judge the media they consume, and was first presented in The Atlantic.

But a close look at the study, which was co-authored by Dennis and covered 8 Arab countries (including Qatar), calls into question how independently research can truly be conducted in Qatar.

One section, titled State of the Nation, was meant to explore “general sentiment in each nation regarding optimism/pessimism about the direction of the country (right direction/ wrong track) and one’s own future.”

But this politically sensitive part of the survey, which was included for all of the survey’s other countries (including politically repressive ones such as Saudi Arabia), was not asked in Qatar “at the request of the Qatar Statistics Authority.”




Other delicate parts of the study were also clearly censored by the Qatari government. In sections titled Freedom, Privacy, and Regulation on the Internet and The Internet and Political Influence, the study notes “the wording of select statements was altered in Qatar at the request of the Qatar Statistics Authority.”

Essentially, for Qatar (and Qatar only), any statements which referred to politics and could potentially undermine the ruling monarchy’s legitimacy were eliminated and replaced with inoffensive language.

For example, a question which asked responders whether one’s Internet use increased or decreased contact with “people who share your political views” became “[people] who share your views on society.”

Pictures of the redacted methodologies are shown below. The changes made for Qatar are highlighted in green:









Aside from research, NU-Q has also hosted several major conferences under Dennis’ tenure. The first, in 2011, was held in Libya, not Qatar, and called for a “free media” to emerge in the country. Whether it worked is debatable, but directly calling for a free media where NU-Q was actually located would probably not have been possible.

The other conferences, one on “Big Data” and another on Qatar’s local media, show an emphasis on unifying Qatar’s media, public relations, and communications sectors.

But these lavish galas produce few concrete results and have been criticised by faculty members who feel they are part of a corporate environment Dennis has instilled.

“They produce these policy papers and photo ops which don’t really seem to lead anywhere,” said one former faculty member. “That kind of corporate culture is not why I went into academia, I would’ve become a corporate person at 22 and already got my million by now.”

Moreover, some say NU-Q’s ambitious restructuring has come at the cost of focusing on actual hard-hitting journalism.

“I think the focus on journalism careers is not there anymore,” said Shabina Khatri, the executive editor of Doha News and a former adjunct lecturer at the school, adding she was disappointed more and more students were going into PR instead of journalism.

Khatri also said Dennis “definitely has a different take and vision for NU-Q than the founding members” and has transformed the school “into a more formal, less friendly and more businesslike environment.” But Khatri added that she was “not sure if that change was necessary for the university’s survival at QF [the Qatar Foundation, NU-Q’s backer].”


 Marche ou Crève

 But why have all these problems not been reported elsewhere? Sources say NU-Q’s outward image is tightly-controlled.

After all, one of its own students, Usama Hamed, was jailed for 10 days and accused of being a “Syrian spy” by the authorities – something which was never reported at NU-Q’s equivalent to The Daily NorthwesternThe Daily Q.

It’s hard to imagine this being the case in Evanston if a Medill student was jailed and accused of being a foreign spy for his reporting. (Insiders say Dennis was “livid” when Hamed’s story was broken by THE CHRONICLE a year after it actually occurred.)

And yet, despite all of these problems, Northwestern in Evanston has gone above and beyond in its support for NU-Q.

For example, President Morton Schapiro and Provost Dan Linzer have outright denied NU-Q ever told Usama Hamed that “Northwestern does not help or support criminals” after he sought help, a dubious declaration even the school itself never officially made (it simply refused to comment on the matter.)

Schapiro and Linzer did not respond to requests for interview by THE CHRONICLE. But one factor which almost certainly plays into Northwestern in Evanston’s support of NU-Q is money.

It has long been rumoured Northwestern in Evanston receives a yearly “bonus” for hosting NU-Q – it already got an undisclosed “contribution” for agreeing to set up a branch in Qatar. Word on the street is that the yearly bonus is a $10 million donation straight to NU-E’s endowment, but there is no way of independently confirming this number.

Asked how much this yearly contribution was, James Hurley, Northwestern’s Associate Vice President of Budget and Planning, requested THE CHRONICLE omit the entire matter from its reporting.

“On that particular one, I’m going to ask you not to reference that in the article,” Hurley said, visibly uncomfortable. “Please be careful with that.”

Quote_3_finalAdditionally, in a place where the stakes are as high as Qatar, any wavering in support from Northwestern’s home campus could weaken NU-Q’s position within the country – especially with a school which teaches as sensitive a topic as journalism.

It’s not uncommon for government-funded projects with lofty aspirations to go very wrong in Qatar.

One example is the Doha Centre for Media Freedom (DCMF), an institute set up by the government to promote freedom of the press in the Gulf and abroad.  This December, the DCMF’s director, Jan Keulen ,was abruptly fired without warning or reason. A senior manager of the centre resigned in protest, writing “this kind of fake support for freedom initiatives is a bloody shame.”

It doesn’t seem likely such a drastic change would occur in NU-Q’s case – for now. Professors at NU-Q are still free to express whatever views they want in the classroom, no small feat in a Persian Gulf country. But the world outside the Education City bubble looms large, and in the long run, nothing is certain.

How long NU-Q can keep standing by, especially as press freedom gets worse and its own research goes through government censorship, is unclear. Moreover, students are still arrested for relatively minor incidents, as seen this September when Usama Hamed was arrested yet again for filming a gas station explosion.

Interestingly, Dennis is using these arrests as a selling point; during a talk in Evanston last October, he said that although “students are occasionally detained by police, this challenge enriches the experience.”


When it comes to Western branch campuses in the region, Gulf expert Christopher Davidson of Britain’s Durham University says it’s “unrealistic” to think the same standards of academic freedom and non-discrimination can be upheld in the long run.

“All kinds of problems, ranging from freedom of expression, attitudes to homosexuality, Iranian/Israeli students, etc., eventually manifest themselves. Most often the red line issues are circumvented, sometimes by self-censorship,” Davidson told THE CHRONICLE. “And it’s unlikely critical research will be undertaken on such topics.”

For now, NU-Q’s balancing act continues; research, programming, and hiring are going along briskly. But whether these expansions are a sign of NU-Q’s strength rather than its weakness isn’t so sure.

It could well be, as the French Foreign Legion motto goes, that the situation is one of “marche ou crève”– march or die. Any substantially bad PR or direct criticism of Qatar’s absolute monarchy, and NU-Q could find itself in a situation many of its employees have long feared: with its contract on the chopping block.


THE CHRONICLE sent NU-Q’s Dean and CEO Everette E. Dennis a list of the major incidents and themes listed in this article prior to publication. Dennis did not respond to any requests for comment. Provost Dan Linzer and President Morton Schapiro did not respond to requests for comment. Jim Schwoch did not respond to a request for comment.


To read reactions on Twitter to this article, click here.



Photo 1 by Ars Electronia, photo 2 by Omar Chatriwala, photo 3 by Stefano Campolo, photo 4  by Dan.

18 Responses to "In Doha, a “Climate of Fear”"

  1. Journalist   February 15, 2014 at 11:26 am

    Please learn A.P. style, and don’t forget a paper should be like a mini skirt: long enough to cover the topic, but short enough to keep the reader interested.

    Let’s just stick with I gave up half way through.

    Furthermore, you do not distinguish between your anonymous sources, which leads me to believe you really do not have many, secondly how can you blame an institution for the laws of the nation?

    As for Texas A&M they have a fully functioning building and have been here for 11 years, whereas NUQ has only been here for six and is still being hosted by CMUQ.

    As for your LGBTQ staff member, maybe they should have reviewed the nations laws before coming here, because even though many including myself are tolerant and understanding of the LGBT society, the law here is not and in any job even in the Unites States when an employee breaks the law, the employer has the right to terminate their employment.

    As for the employee who got fired for making a comment on a Qatari, that was a generalized comment and in the United States may be seen as racism towards a single race / hate speech, and would have probably received the same punishment there as here.

    Your article is not thought through, it is based on assumption, not fact and is clearly biased even with your attempt at opposing views, your stance is clear.

    How you are a journalist is beyond me. Obviously NU-E does not teach the same journalistic ethics as NU-Q does, if this is the trite that is allowed to be posted.

    Trust me I have much more to say, but sadly a life to get back to.

    • HoHum   February 17, 2014 at 6:36 pm

      1. Are you aware of the sexism of comparing a paper to a mini-skirt? 2. Your equation of hate speech laws in the US and arbitrary firing in Qatar is wildly off-base. You would not be fired and deported in the US for speaking up about sexual harassment. 3. Please try to transcend what appears to be wounded pride and respond to statements with with you disagree with evidence.

  2. Anne Sobel   February 16, 2014 at 12:58 am

    You have a bright future at Fox News, my friend! I wish you well in your misguided pursuit of sensationalized, substance-free journalism.

    • Reem Saad   February 17, 2014 at 1:44 am


  3. NU-Q Wildcat   February 16, 2014 at 1:08 am

    More than half of this tripe should have been slashed through; it shouldn’t have bee published at all. How do you call yourself a Northwestern student when you’ve written an article that misrepresents opinions?

    Dean Dennis’ quote has been placed without a context – it has not been verified.

    Facts are very different from assumption. Maybe, just maybe you should have reported more, and written less.

    “One former staffer…” who is that? Most of your sources sound awfully non existent.

    Take time to learn, understand, and report. And then think twice before writing something like this.

    Credibility has just slipped you by.

  4. Journalist   February 16, 2014 at 10:42 am

    Since you did not write this in a journalistic manner, I won’t bother replying that way.

    Dear Charles,

    I see that you are very fond of Qatar since almost all your stories are about the country. The fact that you aren’t a known Journalist (on an international level) shows that you can’t really keep a source, wait, ALL your sources anonymous. Thats what we were taught at NUQ, it makes your story unbelievable. As the above comment stated, NUQ has been running for only six years and any institute, government or organization will always face trouble. Its too early to judge.

    Going back to the part that we don’t work at newspapers, us graduates are working in very strong organizations, ministries, PR firms and film houses. Some work for high government officials while some also work under the office of the Emir, so good for us!

    I really hate how your anonymous sources victimise themselves, did they not tell you how they used to judge the Qatari community for our traditions? Just because you have a different background does not mean its right or that it works here. The staff are told that the culture in Qatar is VERY different from the United States, it just takes basic research to know this. Btw, we aren’t really dagger carrying students, who scream at our professors for disagreeing with the Qatari law and scaring them like many in the West assume.

    I don’t see any NUQ students interviewed on what they think, why is that? This article is very biased and has a weird agenda of criticising NUQ and the country.

    Being an Arab Charles and hospitality is in our blood. I invite you to my country to spend a few weeks/months if you want, all on my expense to actually walk the streets, meet the people and have a better understanding. If you by any chance have been here before, let me tell you 10 days is not enough to judge and study a country. Lets talk and have a conversation over coffee, convince me and I’ll convince you. Reach out to us students here, we don’t bite. lol.

  5. Student at NUQ   February 16, 2014 at 9:56 pm

    There is an old Arabic saying that states, “if you’re going to throw a stone in the mouth of every dog that barks there would be no stones left in the country.” So I’m not going to respond to all the none sense, I just have two things to say:

    1) If you’re going to make claims on an institution you’ve never visited or spent time in, what gives you the right to make such intense claims? Have you even spoken to current students/graduates/staff/faculty? Obviously not, and that is why your article is very biased.

    2) I urge whoever reads this article to look deeper and ask more people before believing whatever is written here without enough support or backup from the author. I’m not saying that everything that was mentioned is false, I’m just saying that there is always two sides to a story, and this one is not even the first half.

    If I were to be as ignorant as you are and make random claims and false assumptions, I’d say, “good luck writing for a cheap gossip magazine!” It’s the only suitable place for people who write/report/and have a tone like you :)!

  6. Student at NUQ   February 16, 2014 at 9:58 pm

    Talking about freedom of speech and censorship in the article when comments posted to the website “awaits moderation.” LOL!

  7. NU-Q staffer   February 17, 2014 at 2:42 am

    Hi Charles,
    I’m curious how many current NU-Q faculty and staff you approached for this story. There are literally dozens of people here who would be happy to talk to you about what NU-Q is really like. Strange that you relied instead on anonymous, disgruntled ex-employees. Is this what they’re teaching in Evanston?

    • Charles Rollet   February 17, 2014 at 2:49 am

      Thanks for your question. I obviously can’t give you specifics, but I contacted a lot of people at NU-Q about whether a “climate of fear” existed and almost all confirmed it was true in some way or another, on or off the record.

      In the hope of balancing the story, I contacted several people on the faculty and admin side who I thought would give me a different opinion. However, none of these people replied to my (repeated) emails. And Dean Dennis, of course, did not respond to any of the concerns I brought up in the article, which I sent to him before publication.

  8. Pingback: NU-Q Arab Media Use Study made exceptions for Qatar | JustHere

  9. Alanood   February 17, 2014 at 7:08 am

    I’m not sure how strong the climate of fear is and I am sure there is one just like their is one in Evanston. The fear I speak about is political correctness.

    That said, I don’t think the students in Qatar are afraid with the exception to when a security guard stops and questions students. However, that’s because of Qatari culture.

    I have yet to come across to a Qatari female who wants to be a journalist reporting in the street everyday but that is because of the pay and limited opportunities.

    I think Qataris would hope there is more of a climate of fear. Frequently, we discuss openly about state politics and sometimes it rubs us the wrong way but nothing gets done and the professors don’t fear speaking about.

    It is a climate that holds freedom of expression highly in regard. I can think of multiple instances of multiple people who have written politically incorrect and even deeming books discussed (sometimes favorably) in public.

  10. Amused   February 17, 2014 at 6:21 pm

    I’m amused at all the ad hominem attacks on the author of this piece. How about providing rebuttals supported by evidence? Or does NU-Q not teach you to do that?

  11. Sun seeker   February 18, 2014 at 4:44 am

    I think some of the comments, which I assume made by NU-Q students, show that NU-Q still has long way to go to educate the local society about their basic god given rights, not to mention their political aspirations !
    Somehow it makes sense that most of the few locals that get the chance to go to E. C. schools are children of the more influential families.

  12. Medill Alum   February 18, 2014 at 2:04 pm

    I found this piece very illuminating. NU-Q appears to be walking a tightrope; teaching journalism in a relatively closed, and sometimes intolerant, society. I would be interested to hear journalists’ opinions on the apparent tension between Medill’s mission and the source(s) of NU-Q’s funding. Perhaps this story is a bit too negative, and could have used some balance from faculty and students who are genuinely happy there. The struggles of a start-up are far less interesting and newsworthy to me than the values and principles at stake.

    The comments above from sensitive NU-Q students seem to be a bit off base. Sure, they may have reason to feel defensive of a place they cherish, but the author clearly did a lot of reporting for the story. It may not be perfect, but it’s an attempt to cover something that I haven’t read much about, aside from the NU propaganda. The quotes from Dennis and Hurley to the Chronicle on matters of morale and budgets suggest a level of opacity that any journalist should find suspicious.

    Finally, if the comment from “Anne Sobel” truly came from the NU-Q faculty member, that’s a sad commentary on the quality of instructor that’s been brought aboard in Doha. An ad hominem attack on the undergraduate student who wrote this story, coupled with a childish, political shot at an news organization she doesn’t like? Classy. Would she take a similar swipe at the government that’s bankrolling NU-Q?

    • Current NU-Q employee   February 19, 2014 at 6:30 am

      NU-Q students, this story was not about you. You’re interesting and your opinion is important, but it was not about your opinion of NU-Q.

      To the author: sadly, the scandalous spin of the story takes away from the important issues it covers, one in particular that was not explicitly stated: NU-Q claims that it is just like NU in terms of the education it gives and, really, can it be?

      Why doesn’t Dean Dennis speak to this? Or, about his agenda of ‘cleaning up shop’? No, he does not have to defend his actions since he was hired to be in charge and it’s his ship. BUT, shouldn’t he explain them?

      The journalist had a clear opinion on matters, and of course, fired employees would be disgruntled. These issues and the structure of the story detract from the facts. Yes, I said it. THE FACTS. While it is clear that Dean Dennis’ is painted black by this journalist and that this is an opinion, the rest of the facts are true. I work at NU-Q and can attest that they are true from what I’ve heard and seen. I will also say that I am afraid to say who I am because I believe that the consequences are not worth it – possible confrontation and being called out for disloyalty.

      The question I have is, how do we improve? How do we make a better workplace for those who come here from now on and those of us who continue to work here? This is critical, and of great importance since it directly influences the success of NU-Q.

      Thank you for bringing this to light. Emotions aside folks, we should encourage these kinds of questions so that we know we are watched and that our actions speak louder than our words.

  13. Chuck Kleinhans   February 18, 2014 at 3:06 pm

    In all my years of reading The Chronicle, I’ve never agreed with the editorial and opinion views, but from time to time the reporting has covered something vastly ignored by other media outlets. This is a good example of shining light on a matter.
    If the reporter doesn’t have the full picture, or there’s more of substance to add, or if the sources and facts could be tweaked: well, journalists get busy!

    When the administration (any administration) stonewalls, that should energize journalists.

  14. NU-E Grad student   May 20, 2014 at 8:29 am

    I found the facts of this article to be very illuminating, even if flavored at times with a biased tone. Thank you for writing it. The many ad hominem attacks by the NU-Q student body, however, leave much to be desired regarding their grasp of ethics in journalism–very petty, off point, and excessively defensive on an issue that has nothing to do with any of them personally. The hospitality of your country (or your ability to personally pay for the author to come and witness that hospitality) is not the issue here. It is about the opacity of NU’s administration and unethical executive decisions allowed to be made under that cloak, along with NU-Q’s operation under a government with laws against freedom of press.


Leave a Reply to Anne Sobel Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published.